A month or two ago I did a funeral service for someone without any strong church connection. For that reason they chose to have the funeral service at the local Eagle Club or Aerie as I believe they call them. Now I knew about service clubs like the lions, and I was familiar with the Elk and Moose Clubs we had in town but I had never heard of the Eagles. While I waited for the time of the service I spent some time wandering around looking at the walls. They had lots of posters extolling the virtues of things like Fraternity and Loyalty. In addition there was a whole string of awards. Every award was for growth. Basically if you club grew in a given year, or decade you got another award for your wall, another patch for your banner.
Now, I know that clubs need to grow, that bring in new people is a healthy thing and all of that, but I walking around and just looking at things I could not figure out what the point of the Eagle Club was expect growing ... well and gathering together to share a few drinks. I college one of my excuses for not joining a fraternity was that I did not need to pay for my friends. This seemed a lot like that. I realize that fraternities are about much more than just paying to have friends ... and I suspect the Eagle Club is the same way, but the message I got was that the point of the club was to grow.
My question is ... are in the church any different? I am as guilty as the next person of wanting the church to grow just to grow. As a member of a liberal, mainline denomination I get tired of hearing about how we are dying out, dwindling away. I would love to be able to have some proof of growth that I could shove back at those who argue this is because of our values, our seminary education, the way we worship, or really anything about us. I would love to have some scientific proof that our church is not in decline. But should we be growing for those reasons? The mission of The United Methodist Church in Minnesota is to make disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world. Now disciple making implies some growth, whether it is growth in numbers or just the development of the people who are already a part of the church could be debated. Transforming the world does not require growth. Growth might stem from such action and growth would certainly help such action, but growth is not sufficient or even a necessary condition for transformation to occur.
If we were going to have banners and celebrations each year, maybe they should be around transforming the world ... harder to measure than growth, but ultimately what I believe we are called to do.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
The whole of the UM denomination is to "make disciples for the transformation of the world". If we focused on that I think we could transform the world.
The church is growing in Africa. I wish they would do more studies (or at least talk more) about what makes them grow. I have my own opinions and I'd say UM's in the U.S. might have a problem with it.
Now, there are some things we can come together and do as a denomination that does transform the world. Change the World (May 14-15) and Imagine No Malaria.
Post a Comment